Two causes of action are at issue here: one under the FEHA and one for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. The Employers Group, the California Employment Law Council, and the Attorney General support defendant Baird. The California Employment Lawyers Association and a plaintiff in a similar, but separate, action support plaintiff Reno. In addition to the parties, five amici curiae have filed briefs in this court. It expressly disagreed with the contrary conclusion of Janken, supra, 46 Cal.App.4th 55. It held that, under the FEHA, "supervisory agents" who committed the alleged unlawful discrimination, as well as the employer, may be sued and held liable for that discrimination. of in violating the FEHA and were therefore also employers" as defined in the act and that the defendants "discriminated against plaintiff on the basis of her medical condition, cancer, and discharged plaintiff because of her medical condition, cancer, in violation of" the FEHA and public policy.īaird moved for summary judgment, arguing that she could not be held individually liable for employment discrimination. As relevant here, the complaint alleged that the business entity defendants hired plaintiff as a registered nurse that these businesses were employers as defined in the FEHA that the individual defendants, including Baird, "acted as agents. Some of the defendants were business entities others, including Marijo Baird, were individuals. Two of them are at issue here: (1) employment discrimination based on medical condition in violation of the FEHA, and (2) discharge in violation of public policy. Plaintiff Kimberly Reno sued several defendants for various causes of action. GM Hughes Electronics (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 55 ( Janken). Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeal judgment, which held that individual employees may be sued and held liable, and approve the contrary holding of Janken v. Our conclusion also applies to common law actions for wrongful discharge. We conclude that the FEHA, like similar federal statutes, allows persons to sue and hold liable their employers, but not individuals. We must decide whether persons claiming discrimination may sue their supervisors individually and hold them liable for damages if they prove their allegations. 1 generally prohibits employers from practicing some kinds of discrimination. The California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Abele as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. Kosanovich, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Paul Grossman and George W. Salerno, Deputy Attorneys General, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Thomas P. Milas, Assistant Attorney General, Christine B. Oborne for Defendant and Respondent.ĭaniel E. Hough as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Concurring opinions by Mosk, J., and by Brown, J., with Baxter, J., concurring.) J., Kennard and Baxter, JJ., and Corrigan, J., fn. KIMBERLY RENO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The advantage here is that it will work on all the apps without any restriction.Reno v. In addition to keyboard shortcuts, you can use Character Map app to insert these symbols. Type the hexadecimal code and then press and hold alt and letter x. For example, type 1F4AB keys and hold Alt and press X keys to produce circling stars symbol □. The code can be inputted through any keyboards but it will work only on Word documents. This method uses the hexadecimal values, alt and x keys. Hold one of the alt keys and then press the numbers one by one using numeric keypad on your keyboard. For example, hold Alt key and then type 127775 keys on the numeric pad will produce the glowing star symbol □. It will work on all Office documents and other applications. This method uses alt key and the decimal code values entered through number pad. There are multiple ways to insert star symbols in Windows. Heavy Eight Pointed Rectilinear Black StarĪpl Functional Symbol Star Diaeresis (Or Umlaut)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |